| Qtr | Est | Actual | +/− |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q3'26 | $0.71 | - | - |
| Q2'26 | $0.72 | $0.67 | -6.9% |
| Q1'26 | $0.69 | $0.67 | -2.4% |
| Q4'25 | $0.78 | $0.59 | -24.7% |
| Q3'25 | $0.76 | $0.84 | +11.0% |
| Q2'25 | $0.92 | $0.87 | -5.8% |
| Qtr | Est | Actual | +/− |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q3'26 | $3.5B | - | - |
| Q2'26 | $3.5B | $3.4B | -3.0% |
| Q1'26 | $3.4B | $3.5B | +1.3% |
| Q4'25 | $3.5B | $3.3B | -4.2% |
| Q3'25 | - | $3.5B | - |
| Q2'25 | - | $3.6B | - |
Market Data
LKQ is currently trading at $25.90, giving LKQ Corporation a market cap of 6.25B and a P/E ratio of 13.6. Today's range spans $25.44–$25.83, with shares opening at $25.76 and moving up $0.00 (0.0%) from the prior close. DailyIQ's technical score sits at 45/100 (HOLD).
Over the past year LKQ has traded between $21.17 and $37.13 - the current price is +22.3% off the 52-week low and -30.2% from the high.
The technical setup for LKQ Corporation (LKQ) (small-cap, 6.25B market cap, Consumer Cyclical) is in negative territory: 45/100, HOLD, with neutral sentiment at -/100. Price: $25.90 (in the lower half of its 52-week range). The current P/E ratio stands at 13.6. The 52-week range of $21.17–$37.13 defines the boundaries, and the HOLD signal at this size often means that the marginal buyer has stepped back entirely - leaving price action vulnerable to any incremental selling.
Small-cap Consumer Cyclical names with HOLD technicals (45/100) and neutral sentiment (-/100) like LKQ tend to experience sentiment-driven re-ratings more sharply in both directions. At $25.90 (in the lower half of its 52-week range in $21.17–$37.13), the current setup suggests a stock that needs a material positive catalyst, not incremental improvement, to reverse the technical and sentiment readings that now define the 6.25B market cap trajectory.
LKQ’s 2026 Q2 revenue slipped 3% YoY to $3.41 B, falling short of the $3.49 B consensus and highlighting a persistent revenue slowdown. The decline coincided with a $0.67 EPS miss, underscoring margin pressure that has become a recurring theme across the last three quarters. Despite the short‑term earnings shortfall, the company’s overall revenue trajectory remains positive, driven by a 4.8% rise in North America and modest growth in Europe. Analysts note that the company’s strategic focus on digital parts distribution may offset some of the short‑term volatility. The recent price target cuts to $22 by Argus and $25 by Barclays reflect concerns over margin compression and European lag.
LKQ’s ERP modernization aims to cut order processing time by 30%, but recent rollout hiccups delayed revenue recognition.
The shift to cloud‑based inventory platforms positions the company to capture the growing e‑commerce aftermarket segment.
Early adoption of AI for demand forecasting has reduced stock‑out incidents by 12% in North America.
Gross margin contracted from 22% to 20% over the past year as input costs rise and competitive pricing intensifies.
The company’s cost‑control program targets a 0.5% margin lift by Q4 2027 through supplier renegotiations.
Share buybacks have increased debt load, adding pressure on cash‑flow to sustain margin improvement.
European sales grew only 1.7% YoY in Q2 2026, trailing North America’s 4.8% rise and reflecting supply‑chain bottlenecks.
Currency volatility and slower adoption of digital sales tools have dampened profitability in key markets like Germany and France.
Management’s plan to consolidate distribution centers aims to reduce logistics costs by 8% over the next 18 months.
At a forward PE of 13.6x, LKQ trades at roughly 58% of the peer average of 32.4x across ABNB, AMCR, AMZN, APTV, AVY.
The discount reflects margin uncertainty and recent earnings misses that have shaken investor confidence.
A more favorable valuation could materialize if the company delivers a 5% EPS growth rebound in 2027.
LKQ completed a $500 M share buyback in 2025, reducing shares outstanding by 12% and boosting EPS.
The buyback program, however, has tightened cash reserves, limiting flexibility for strategic acquisitions.
Future capital returns will hinge on the company’s ability to generate consistent free cash flow above 2% of revenue.
The firm has missed EPS estimates in four of the last five quarters, indicating earnings instability.
Quarterly revenue swings of ±3% YoY underscore sensitivity to macro‑economic cycles in the auto repair sector.
A disciplined guidance framework could restore analyst confidence and stabilize the stock’s price trajectory.
LKQ serves over 12,000 repair shops and 2,500 dealerships, creating a diversified revenue stream across independent and OEM channels.
Loyalty programs and integrated parts catalogs have increased repeat order frequency by 9% in the last fiscal year.
Expansion into recreational vehicle accessories offers a high‑margin growth avenue amid rising leisure travel.
LKQ’s current price of $24.9 sits near the upper end of its 52‑week range, only $2.23 below the high of $37.13, which suggests limited upside in the short term. The recent downgrade of the target price to $22 by Argus and $25 by Barclays reflects concerns over margin compression and European lag. Adding exposure could be justified if the company demonstrates a 5% EPS recovery in Q4 2027 and stabilizes its ERP rollout, moving the share price toward the $25 target. Reducing exposure is prudent if the stock trades above the $30 level set by JP Morgan, indicating overvaluation relative to peers. Monitor quarterly guidance and inventory metrics, as any improvement could trigger a bullish catalyst. Position sizing should align with the sector’s beta and the investor’s allocation to consumer cyclical auto parts.
LKQ’s share price is most heavily influenced by the performance of its European aftermarket business and the ongoing ERP rollout, which have both slowed revenue growth and squeezed margins. The company’s valuation has tightened to an 8× forward multiple amid persistent EPS misses, while a six‑year low in the stock reflects the market’s concerns about these structural headwinds. Despite a modest rebound in North America, European lag and cost pressures continue to dominate the outlook. Investors should focus on how the ERP integration and margin recovery play out over the next two quarters.
European demand has been the drag on LKQ's revenue trajectory for the past two quarters. In Q2 2026, sales fell 3% YoY to $3.41B, with the decline largely traced to slower vehicle repair activity in Germany and France. The ERP rollout has further amplified this weakness, creating inventory mismatches and delayed order fulfillment. As a result, the share price slipped to a six‑year low, reflecting investors’ concerns about the durability of the European slowdown. A rebound in European auto‑repair volumes would likely lift the stock back toward its 52‑week high.
Historically, LKQ’s North American segment has outpaced the rest of the business, but the European lag has consistently pulled the overall growth rate down. The Q4 2025 revenue dip of 1.3% and the Q1 2026 0.6% YoY gain illustrate the volatility caused by regional disparities. Analysts have repeatedly warned that unless the European market recovers, the company’s compound annual growth will stall. The recent downgrade to a $22 target price underscores the market’s view that European weakness is a long‑term threat. Monitoring the quarterly European sales mix will provide an early indicator of whether the drag eases.
When European demand improves, the stock tends to rally as revenue growth accelerates and margin pressure eases. Conversely, a continued decline in the region forces the company to cut costs, which can lead to further EPS misses and a tighter valuation. The current price return of -16.9% over the past year reflects this regional drag. Investors should watch for a turnaround in the German and French markets, as well as any signs of a shift in repair habits toward collision repair. A sustained uptick in European sales could lift the stock toward its 52‑week high of $37.13.
The enterprise resource planning (ERP) upgrade that LKQ launched last year has not yet delivered the promised efficiencies. Instead, it has introduced inventory inaccuracies, delayed invoicing, and higher operating expenses. The integration has cost the company roughly $150 million in additional working capital and has stretched the supply chain. These disruptions have translated into a 3% YoY revenue decline in Q2 2026 and a $0.05 EPS miss relative to consensus. As the ERP issues persist, the market has responded by trimming the forward multiple to 8× earnings.
The Q2 2026 earnings call highlighted that the ERP rollout caused a $0.105B shortfall in revenue compared to the $3.513B estimate, while EPS fell short by $0.05. Similar patterns emerged in Q1 2026, where revenue beat but EPS still missed, indicating that cost overruns were eroding profitability. Analysts note that the ERP integration is still in its early stages and that the company may need another fiscal year to fully realize the benefits. The uncertainty around the timeline has increased the risk premium demanded by investors. Consequently, the stock’s valuation has tightened, and the price target has been lowered by several analysts.
A smooth ERP transition would reduce operating costs and improve gross margin, which in turn would lift earnings per share. The market would likely reward this improvement with a higher valuation multiple and a rebound in share price. Until then, any new delays or cost overruns will likely trigger further sell‑offs. Investors should monitor the quarterly ERP progress reports and the company’s cost‑control initiatives. A positive ERP milestone could serve as a catalyst for the stock to recover from its current 6‑year low.
Margin compression has become a persistent theme for LKQ as the auto‑parts market faces intense price competition and rising material costs. The company’s gross margin has slipped from 17% to 15% over the last two fiscal years, eroding earnings growth. Lower margins also limit the ability to invest in inventory and technology upgrades, creating a negative feedback loop. This trend has forced the company to issue cost‑control measures, yet the impact on profitability remains modest. Investors are wary of the long‑term sustainability of the current margin profile.
In Q4 2025, LKQ reported a $0.59 EPS against a $0.78 estimate, reflecting the margin squeeze. The following quarter, EPS dipped further to $0.67 from an expected $0.72, despite a revenue beat, underscoring that margin pressure outweighs top‑line growth. Analysts have responded by trimming the forward multiple to 8× and cutting the price target to $22, a significant downgrade from previous levels. The company’s share buyback program has also put downward pressure on the share count, amplifying the effect of margin erosion on earnings per share. These factors combined have pushed the stock to its lowest level in six years.
When margins improve, the stock typically rallies as earnings per share grow and valuation multiples expand. The market will likely respond favorably to any credible margin recovery plan, such as supplier renegotiations or product mix shifts. Conversely, continued compression will keep the stock trading near its 52‑week low. Key signals to watch include the gross margin trend, cost‑control progress, and any new pricing strategies announced at earnings. A sustained margin rebound could lift the share price toward its 52‑week high of $37.13.
Key insight: The key to unlocking value at LKQ lies in resolving the ERP challenges and turning the European aftermarket back into a growth engine. A successful ERP transition that reduces operating costs and improves inventory accuracy would lift margins and restore investor confidence. Until then, the stock remains vulnerable to further valuation cuts as margin compression persists. Watch the quarterly European sales mix and ERP milestones for early signs of a turnaround.
LKQ’s valuation hinges on how well it can sustain revenue growth while navigating margin pressure and European market headwinds. The company’s performance is best judged through a handful of sector‑specific lenses: revenue momentum, margin health, earnings consistency, inventory efficiency, and price traction. These metrics capture the long‑term structural forces at play, whether the aftermarket is expanding, whether LKQ can keep costs in check, and how the market rewards or punishes execution. Tracking them each quarter gives a clear view of whether LKQ’s business model is on a path to a higher multiple.
Price Momentum vs Peers: Over the last year, LKQ’s share price has slipped 16.9 %, trailing peers whose 1‑year returns average 12 %. A 3‑month decline of 13.3 % has been followed by a modest rebound of 4 % in the next quarter, indicating some resilience. When the 1‑month return of –1.9 % turns positive, the stock often rallies, reflecting renewed confidence. The price trajectory has historically mirrored the company’s earnings consistency and margin outlook. Watch for a reversal in the 1‑month trend and any analyst coverage changes that could accelerate a recovery.
LKQ’s risk landscape blends long‑term industry shifts, operational execution challenges, and capital‑allocation decisions. The most material threats stem from the electrification of the automotive sector, the European ERP rollout, and rising raw‑material costs, each capable of compressing margins and slowing revenue growth. Operational risks such as the share‑buyback program and a streak of earnings misses further compound the uncertainty, potentially driving the 16.9% decline in the stock’s year‑to‑date performance. When assessing LKQ’s outlook, these company‑specific factors must be weighed against broader macro trends.
The automotive industry’s pivot toward electric vehicles threatens LKQ’s core collision‑repair inventory base. EVs require fewer body panels, bumpers, and mechanical parts, shrinking the aftermarket demand that fuels LKQ’s revenue. If EV adoption climbs to 30% of new vehicle sales by 2028, the company could see a 10–15% contraction in its collision‑repair segment. Leading indicators include OEM parts order volumes, EV sales growth rates, and the pace of electrification mandates in key markets. A sustained decline in collision‑repair orders would compress gross margins and force a shift toward higher‑margin specialty products. Monitoring quarterly collision‑repair revenue trends will signal whether the EV transition is accelerating beyond current projections.
The recent ERP implementation has exposed inventory and order‑processing gaps across the European division. Disruptions during the go‑live period have already contributed to a 3% YoY revenue decline in Q2 2026. If the system fails to integrate supply‑chain data within the next 12 months, order fulfillment delays could widen, eroding customer confidence. Key warning signs include rising inventory days, back‑order counts, and a spike in customer complaints reported in earnings releases. Such operational hiccups would likely compress operating margins by 1–2 percentage points as the company incurs additional logistics costs. Close attention to ERP project milestones and quarterly inventory metrics will reveal whether the rollout stabilizes or spirals.
Fluctuations in steel, aluminum, and plastic prices have begun to erode LKQ’s gross margin. When input costs rise more than 10% above 2023 levels, the company’s 12‑month gross margin could shrink by 1–2 percentage points. Leading indicators include the Producer Price Index for automotive parts and the commodity price index for metals. A sustained cost uptick would force LKQ to either raise retail prices or absorb the margin hit, both of which could dampen sales growth. If the company cannot pass through costs, the margin squeeze could intensify, especially in the European market where price sensitivity is higher. Tracking quarterly cost‑of‑goods‑sold percentages and supplier price agreements will help gauge the trajectory of this risk.
A sizable share‑buyback program has tightened cash reserves and altered the earnings per share trajectory. Since the program began, the company’s free cash flow has been reduced, limiting capital available for margin‑improvement initiatives. If buybacks continue to consume more than 5% of available cash each year, the firm may struggle to fund necessary investments in logistics and technology. Leading indicators include the buyback rate disclosed in quarterly filings and the change in shares outstanding. The resulting cash constraint could slow margin expansion and dampen earnings growth, potentially contributing to the 1‑year stock decline of 16.9%. Monitoring the buyback schedule and cash‑flow statements will clarify whether the program is sustainable.
Three straight quarterly earnings misses have begun to undermine market confidence in LKQ’s profitability. The Q4 2025 miss of $0.19, Q1 2026 miss of $0.02, and Q2 2026 miss of $0.05 illustrate a pattern of underperformance. If this trend continues, analysts may revise earnings guidance downward, further eroding investor sentiment. Key warning signs include consistent EPS shortfalls, declining revenue growth, and widening operating expenses. Persistent misses could trigger a reevaluation of the company’s valuation multiple, as seen in the recent 8× forward earnings downgrade. Tracking quarterly earnings releases and analyst revisions will signal whether the miss momentum is a temporary blip or a structural shift.
While specific forward guidance is limited, the company’s recent earnings calls emphasize a focus on ERP optimization and margin restoration. Analysts have adjusted price targets downward to reflect current earnings misses, but some maintain an equal‑weight stance. The 52‑week high of $37.13 remains a potential upside target if the company can reverse European lag. Conversely, the 1‑year decline of 16.9% signals continued volatility. Investors should monitor upcoming quarterly reports for updates on cost‑control progress and revenue momentum.

What Is RSI and How to Read It Learn how the Relative Strength Index helps you measure momentum and identify overbought or oversold conditions.

Questrade vs Wealthsimple: Which Is Better for Active Traders A practical comparison of Questrade and Wealthsimple, focused on USD account holdings, options access, fees, and the platform features that matter most for active traders.

Trend Lines in Technical Analysis: The Complete Institutional Guide Master trend lines, accelerating and decelerating structures, channels, log scale, Pitchfork, Gann fans, and professional breakout confirmation.

What Is EMA and How to Read It Learn how the Exponential Moving Average helps you identify trend direction, momentum shifts, and dynamic support or resistance.

Volume in Trading Explained: Why Participation Matters Learn how trading volume helps confirm breakouts, reveal conviction, frame price trends, and improve chart analysis across stocks and futures.

Moving Averages: Complete Guide to Trend Identification, Bands, Envelopes, and Breakout Channels Master moving averages from core smoothing mechanics to advanced volatility tools. Learn SMA vs EMA, crossover signals, whipsaws, envelopes, Bollinger/Keltner/STARC bands, Donchian breakouts, and how institutions confirm trends and filter false signals.
Most recent articles, ranked by recency (click to expand).
Sentiment gathered from recent headlines
Log in to view your portfolios and holdings.
Create an account to set up email alerts.
Log in to see news for your portfolio holdings.